Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...nal) capacity to govern the embedded subject position of their infinitival complement. ...ect of the [[embedded clause]] receives the Case marking from the [[matrix clause]].
    1 KB (206 words) - 17:10, 13 February 2009
  • ...rix clause]] of a [[sentence]] is interpreted in negating the [[complement clause]]. ...gation in the matrix clause (ia) is interpreted in negating the complement clause, which makes (ia) equivalent to (ib):
    1 KB (215 words) - 19:47, 17 February 2009
  • ...complement clause]] (''Greg to win''). This should not be possible if this clause were a full [[CP]], because ''expect'' could not govern the subject in that ...''John'' to be [[properly governed]] by the matrix [[verb]], the embedded clause may not be a [[barrier]].
    1 KB (171 words) - 15:00, 22 May 2008
  • ...'' is a [[deletion]] of the [[S-bar]] [[node]] of an [[embedded complement clause]]. This operation has been proposed to account for the transparency exhibit
    544 bytes (71 words) - 15:10, 5 October 2014
  • '''Restructuring''' is a process which unites two clauses yielding one [[clause]]. ...appens in (ii). In general, Restructuring is assumed in order to explain [[clause union]] phenomena in Romance languages, such as [[Clitic Climbing]] and lon
    2 KB (335 words) - 17:14, 28 September 2014
  • The NPs ''John'' and ''apples'' in (i)a are arguments of ''eat'' and the embedded sentence in (i)b is an argument of ''obvious''. The phrase ''next week'' in ...ional phrases that are not syntactically required, but serve to modify the clause or another constituent.
    3 KB (409 words) - 17:35, 18 June 2014