Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ..., in the sense that every morpheme has one form and one meaning, and every meaning corresponds to exactly one form. This relation is called [[biuniqueness]]. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Natural+Morphology&lemmacode=488 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
    833 bytes (118 words) - 19:43, 17 February 2009
  • ...ry [[morpheme]] has one phonological form and one [[meaning]], and every [[meaning]] (or grammatical category) corresponds to exactly one phonological form. *Dressler, W. 1985a. On the Predictiveness of Natural Morphology. ''Journal of Linguistics 21'', 321-338.
    624 bytes (80 words) - 19:05, 20 June 2014
  • ...[[Montague Grammar]] is the most detailed example of a semantic theory for natural language based on the principles of logical semantics. * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    910 bytes (127 words) - 10:21, 17 February 2009
  • ...2) made the claim that natural kind terms (i.e. names of biological sorts, natural or mineral substances) are also rigid designators. * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    1 KB (179 words) - 18:50, 28 September 2014
  • ...ed, due to the impreciseness of natural language. In ''John is tall'', the meaning of the adjective ''tall'' is vague in the sense that the precise degree of * Chierchia and McConnell-Ginet 1990. ''Meaning and grammar,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
    763 bytes (104 words) - 08:44, 30 August 2014
  • An '''icon''' is a [[sign]] whose meaning is directly linked to its form. In natural language, icons are found in the form of [[onomatopoetic word]]s and [[soun
    220 bytes (34 words) - 20:50, 3 July 2014
  • ...inclusive, because it allows the propositions phi and psi both to be true. Natural language ''or'' can also be used exclusively: only one of the two propositi * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    871 bytes (126 words) - 20:48, 12 February 2009
  • * Barwise, J. & R. Cooper 1981. ''Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,'' Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219 * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    2 KB (279 words) - 20:29, 12 February 2009
  • * Barwise, J. & R. Cooper 1981. ''Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,'' Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219 * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    1 KB (167 words) - 20:08, 16 February 2009
  • * Barwise, J. & R. Cooper 1981. ''Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,'' Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219 * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    2 KB (274 words) - 15:27, 15 February 2009
  • ...g the quantifying determiner (''every man, some woman'') or by an inherent meaning element (''everyone, something''). * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    1 KB (166 words) - 17:32, 28 September 2014
  • ...sofar as there is no direct link between the form (''signifiant'') and the meaning (''signifié'') of a sign. There are systematic exceptions to the principle
    613 bytes (94 words) - 17:34, 18 June 2014
  • * Barwise, J. & R. Cooper 1981. ''Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,'' Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219 * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    1 KB (164 words) - 19:02, 17 February 2009
  • It is a standard assumption that natural language expressions such as ''each girl'' and ''everyone'' contain (or are * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    740 bytes (106 words) - 16:46, 24 August 2014
  • * Barwise, J. & R. Cooper 1981. ''Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,'' Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219 * Chierchia and McConnell-Ginet 1990. ''Meaning and grammar,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
    830 bytes (106 words) - 03:37, 18 May 2009
  • ...cording to the syntax of propositional logic. The semantics interprets the meaning of the logical constants in terms of [[truth-value]]s. Propositional logic When we translate the natural language statements in (i) into propositional logic (as in (ii)) we get the
    1 KB (221 words) - 19:16, 27 September 2014
  • * Barwise, J. & R. Cooper 1981. ''Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,'' Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219 * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    2 KB (263 words) - 21:09, 12 February 2009
  • ...[Richard Montague]]. It is based on the idea that the meaning theories for natural languages and formal languages can and should be based on the same principl ...ontaining possible worlds and moments of time, and crucial use is made of #meaning postulates. The range of constructions and phenomena treated in PTQ include
    2 KB (304 words) - 18:24, 21 September 2014
  • * Barwise, J. & R. Cooper 1981. ''Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,'' Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159-219 * Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. ''Logic, language, and meaning,'' Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    1 KB (170 words) - 19:13, 27 September 2014

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)