Search results

Create the page "Quirk, Randolph" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

• Complement (predicative)
  ...as [[predicate nominal]]. This terminology is widely known especially from Quirk et al. 1985. [[Quirk, Randolph]] & [[Greenbaum, Sidney]] & [[Leech, Geoffrey]] & [[Svartvik, Jan]]. 1985.
  668 bytes (81 words) - 17:02, 5 February 2009
• Predeterminer
  In Quirk et al.'s (1985) influential grammar of English, a '''predeterminer''' is an [[Quirk, Randolph]] & [[Greenbaum, Sidney]] & [[Leech, Geoffrey]] & [[Svartvik, Jan]]. 1985.
  450 bytes (56 words) - 19:13, 20 July 2014
• Syntactic function
  This is the term used in [[Functional Grammar]] (Dik 1989) and also in Quirk et al. (1985:723-738) *Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum & Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. ''A Comprehensive
  639 bytes (77 words) - 18:00, 29 March 2008
• Semantic role
  ...ot incorporating confusing components like "thematic", "case", etc.) (e.g. Quirk et al. 1985:740ff.) *Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum & Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. ''A Comprehensive
  1 KB (145 words) - 21:15, 30 June 2007
• Ditransitiv
  ...et sich bei Engel & Longacre (1963:337). Vielleicht ist der Terminus durch Quirk et al. 1972 populär geworden. *Quirk, Randolph et al. 1972. ''A grammar of contemporary English.'' ( ii. 38 All transitive
  2 KB (204 words) - 18:26, 28 June 2014
• Future tense
  According to Quirk et al. (1985), there are three different predictive senses of the ''will''- ...willingness and insistence and thus extends from weak to strong volition (Quirk et al. 1985: 228).
  9 KB (1,339 words) - 22:00, 19 September 2009
• Register (discourse)
  ...day’s concept of register, although they never make use of this term. Yet, Quirk et. al. (1989, 25) present a “five-term distinction” to categorize ling ...hearty' (ibid.) is used between family members or close friends. However, Quirk et. al. point out that the inner three-way distinction of formal – neutra
  16 KB (2,262 words) - 16:59, 22 May 2013