Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...(ed.) 1982), the term '''grammatical function''' is used for [[grammatical relation]]s. ...rammatical relation'' is that the former refers to one of the members of a relation, while the latter refers to a link between two elements.
    1 KB (133 words) - 15:45, 15 February 2009
  • The term '''thematic relation''' is used (especially in Ray Jackendoff’s work and work influenced by hi Alongside [[thematic role]], [[Θ-role]], ''thematic relation'' is perhaps the most common term in current American linguistics (e.g. Wil
    1 KB (143 words) - 19:43, 26 June 2007
  • ...rammar]] had begun to take. It mainly focuses on [[syntax]], including its relation with morphology and semantics. The spelling ''Lexical-Functional Grammar'' is also used (e.g. Falk 2001, and on Joan Bresnan's ho
    4 KB (631 words) - 16:43, 9 April 2008
  • ...related word (e.g. ''dog'') than when there is no semantic or associative relation between the two words (e.g. ''map'').
    707 bytes (108 words) - 15:44, 22 May 2008
  • '''Determiner''' is term for any kind of (mostly) non-lexical element preceding a [[noun]] in a [[noun phrase]]. a relation between two sets taken as the denotation of a determiner in the theory of [
    2 KB (279 words) - 20:29, 12 February 2009
  • ...nto the cup''. Referential opacity is closely related to the property of [[lexical integrity]].
    842 bytes (134 words) - 09:14, 28 September 2014
  • '''Government''' is a structural relation between a [[governor]] (a head or maximal projection) and a [[governee]]. G The core case of government is the relation between a head and its complement; this case is captured by every existing
    2 KB (275 words) - 15:42, 15 February 2009
  • '''Object''' is a complement which is selected and directly governed by a lexical head. [[Category:Grammatical relation]]
    688 bytes (94 words) - 10:20, 18 February 2009
  • The term '''thematic role''' is a synonym of [[semantic role]] or [[thematic relation]], popularized by Chomsky (1981), although mostly in its abbreviated form [ *[[thematic relation]]
    1 KB (199 words) - 10:08, 10 June 2009
  • * In lexical semantics, complementarity is a [[sense relation]] that holds between predicates whose denotations do not overlap, i.e. ther
    595 bytes (92 words) - 18:55, 22 June 2014
  • ...xical meaning]] vs. [[structural meaning]] (also [[grammatical meaning]]): Lexical meaning concerns the major parts-of-speech, i.e. [[noun|nouns]], [[verb|ver ...al meaning'): In this dichotomy 'lexical' is understood as one aspect of [[lexical meaning]] as described above, i.e. as a meaning that is [[langue]]-specific
    3 KB (375 words) - 13:18, 13 July 2014
  • ...and the other as its [[modifier]], attributing a property to the head. The relation between the members of an endocentric compound can be schematized as 'AB is * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Pho
    1 KB (206 words) - 16:52, 13 February 2009
  • ...ctions' of human language: the existence of LF-uninterpretable features in lexical items, and [[movement]]. Movement of an element A with feature F to the [[c Chomsky (1998, 1999) takes a different view on the relation between feature checking and movement; there, movement is supposed to exist
    1 KB (217 words) - 13:31, 23 April 2008
  • Cohesion in its broadest sense is “a semantic relation between an element in [a] text and some other element that is crucial to th ...ed into the categories: reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion. “Each of these categories is represented in the text by particu
    22 KB (3,425 words) - 17:49, 26 June 2010
  • * Selkirk, E.O. 1984. ''Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure,'' Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. ...,'' in: M. Moortgat, H. Van der Hulst & T. Hoestra (eds.) The Scope of Lexical Rules, Foris, Dordrecht.
    3 KB (370 words) - 22:21, 13 February 2009
  • * Roeper, T. 1987. ''Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267-310 * Roeper, T. and D. Siegel 1978. ''A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds,'' Linguistic Inquiry 9, pp. 199-260
    1 KB (202 words) - 08:43, 16 August 2014
  • ...ts must be contextually given and the remnants must occur in a contrastive relation to their correlates (Winkler 1997 as mentioned in Winkler 2005, Johnson 199
    2 KB (359 words) - 16:55, 17 March 2009
  • [[Binding]] -- [[Cataphoric relation]] -- [[Connotation]] -- [[Cumulative reference]] -- [[Denotation]] -- [[Ext '''Lexical semantics'''<br>
    8 KB (928 words) - 09:11, 20 May 2010
  • * Roeper, T. 1987. ''Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267-310 * Roeper, T. and D. Siegel 1978. ''A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds,'' Linguistic Inquiry 9, pp. 199-260
    2 KB (232 words) - 19:05, 28 September 2014
  • ...German) term '''aktionsart''' is approx. equivalent to the English terms [[lexical aspect]] and [[kind of action]]. ...es of situation found in our natural environment (cf. Verkuyl 1993: 43). [[Lexical aspect]] and its difference from [[grammatical aspect]] has been prominentl
    6 KB (819 words) - 09:15, 14 June 2014

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)