<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Control</id>
	<title>Control - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Control"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Control&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-04T11:05:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Control&amp;diff=6145&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Luo: from Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Control&amp;diff=6145&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-05-18T13:12:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;from Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In generative syntax, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;control&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the phenomenon that the understood ([[PRO]]) subject of an infinitival clause must be anaphorically dependent on a specific argument of the matrix clause. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In phonology, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;control&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a mechanism introduced in DiSciullo &amp;amp; Williams (1987) which assigns a special linkage between the argument of an affix and a position in the verb&amp;#039;s argument structure, thereby preventing that argument from being realized syntactically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Examples===&lt;br /&gt;
In (i), the understood subject of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;to leave&amp;#039;&amp;#039; must be &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; in (ii), it is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Susan&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The case in (i) is called &amp;#039;subject control&amp;#039; (the so-called controller &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a subject), the case in (ii) &amp;#039;object control&amp;#039; (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Susan&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is an indirect object). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(i)  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John promised Susan to leave&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(ii) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John persuaded Susan to leave&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[argument structure]] of the English [[verb]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;employ&amp;#039;&amp;#039; consists of two arguments (viz. AGENT and THEME). If the [[suffix]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;-er&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is added to this verb, the resulting [[noun]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;employer&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is an AGENT, and in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John&amp;#039;s employer&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John&amp;#039;&amp;#039; cannot realize that argument. On the other hand, if the [[suffix]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;-ee&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is added to this verb the resulting noun &amp;#039;&amp;#039;employee&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a THEME, and in the [[NP]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John&amp;#039;s employee&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the noun &amp;#039;&amp;#039;John&amp;#039;&amp;#039; cannot express the THEME role. DiSciullo &amp;amp; Williams account for the difference between &amp;#039;&amp;#039;-er&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;-ee&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by assuming that the [[suffix]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;-er&amp;#039;&amp;#039; controls the external argument (= AGENT role) of the [[verb]] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;employ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, while &amp;#039;&amp;#039;-ee&amp;#039;&amp;#039; controls its internal argument (= THEME role). In both cases, the controlled argument cannot be expressed in syntax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===See also===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Control Theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Link===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Control&amp;amp;lemmacode=932 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
*{{: Chomsky 1981}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Di Sciullo, A. M. &amp;amp; Williams, E. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, Mass: MIT-press.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{: Spencer 1991}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Syntax]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Phonology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Luo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>