<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lexical_array</id>
	<title>Lexical array - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lexical_array"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Lexical_array&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-11-05T20:55:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Lexical_array&amp;diff=7907&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Wohlgemuth: utrecht</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Lexical_array&amp;diff=7907&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2009-02-16T20:24:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;utrecht&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Formal device, introduced in Chomsky (1998); a lexical array is the set of lexical items that will be used in a derivation. The notion is similar to [[numeration]]; the only difference is that the elements in a numeration bear indices, while the elements in a lexical array do not. The empirical evidence for the existence of lexical arrays comes from sentences like the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 (i) a.   There&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is likely [&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; t&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to be&lt;br /&gt;
          [a proof discovered]].&lt;br /&gt;
     b. * There&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is likely [&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a proof to be&lt;br /&gt;
          [ t&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; discovered]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At stage A of the derivation, T&amp;#039;s EPP-feature must be [[check]]ed. This could be done by either merger of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;there&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, or movement of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a proof&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Chomsky argues that (b) is ungrammatical because &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a proof&amp;#039;&amp;#039; has been moved before the expletive is inserted, and this violates [[Merge-over-Move]]. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; This is indirect evidence for the existence of lexical arrays, because the principle of Merge-over-Move doesn&amp;#039;t make sense if we don&amp;#039;t have a restricted set of accessible elements; if the lexicon would be fully accessible during the derivation, and we have Merge-over-Move, we would expect every sentence to have an expletive satisfying the EPP, since merger of an [[expletive]] is cheaper than moving the subject. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; See also [[lexical subarray]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Link ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Lexical+array&amp;amp;lemmacode=1515 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chomsky, N. 1998. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Minimalist inquiries: the framework,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; MIT working papers in linguistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Syntax]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wohlgemuth</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>