<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Negative_concord</id>
	<title>Negative concord - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Negative_concord"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Negative_concord&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-29T22:42:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Negative_concord&amp;diff=3356&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Haspelmath at 07:20, 30 August 2007</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Negative_concord&amp;diff=3356&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-08-30T07:20:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 07:20, 30 August 2007&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Negative concord&#039;&#039;&#039; is a widespread term for cases where negative [[indefinite pronoun]]s cooccur with a separate expression of [[sentential negation]].&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Negative concord&#039;&#039;&#039; is a widespread term for cases where &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;[[&lt;/ins&gt;negative&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;]] &lt;/ins&gt;[[indefinite pronoun]]s cooccur with a separate expression of [[sentential negation]].&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;::*&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;...the ‘concord of negatives’, as we might term the emphasizing of the negative idea by seemingly redundant repetitions. In Old English it was the regular idiom to say: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;an man &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;yste &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;an þing, ‘no man not-knew nothing’; ...and it survives in the vulgar speech of our own days: there was &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;iver nobody else gen (gave) me &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;othin&amp;#039; (George Eliot)&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Jespersen 1922:352)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;::*&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;...the ‘concord of negatives’, as we might term the emphasizing of the negative idea by seemingly redundant repetitions. In Old English it was the regular idiom to say: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;an man &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;yste &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;an þing, ‘no man not-knew nothing’; ...and it survives in the vulgar speech of our own days: there was &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;iver nobody else gen (gave) me &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;othin&amp;#039; (George Eliot)&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Jespersen 1922:352)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Haspelmath</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Negative_concord&amp;diff=3326&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Linguipedia: New page: &#039;&#039;&#039;Negative concord&#039;&#039;&#039; is a widespread term for cases where negative indefinite pronouns cooccur with a separate expression of sentential negation.  ::*&#039;&#039;&quot;...the ‘concord of nega...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Negative_concord&amp;diff=3326&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-08-29T14:54:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Negative concord&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a widespread term for cases where negative &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php?title=Indefinite_pronoun&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Indefinite pronoun (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;indefinite pronouns&lt;/a&gt; cooccur with a separate expression of &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php?title=Sentential_negation&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Sentential negation (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;sentential negation&lt;/a&gt;.  ::*&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;...the ‘concord of nega...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Negative concord&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a widespread term for cases where negative [[indefinite pronoun]]s cooccur with a separate expression of [[sentential negation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;...the ‘concord of negatives’, as we might term the emphasizing of the negative idea by seemingly redundant repetitions. In Old English it was the regular idiom to say: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;an man &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;yste &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;an þing, ‘no man not-knew nothing’; ...and it survives in the vulgar speech of our own days: there was &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;iver nobody else gen (gave) me &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;othin&amp;#039; (George Eliot)&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Jespersen 1922:352)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Examples===&lt;br /&gt;
Russian &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Nikto ničego ne skazal.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ‘Nobody said anything’ (lit. ‘Nobody nothing not said’)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comments===&lt;br /&gt;
The term [[concord]] suggests that such multiple occurrences of negative elements are in some sense related to [[agreement]] phenomena, but the similarity is quite remote. While linguists familiar only with some of major European languages might find negative concord remarkable, it is actually the non-cooccurrence of sentential negation with negative indefinites that is remarkable (Haspelmath 2005).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origin===&lt;br /&gt;
Probably coined by [[Otto Jespersen]] (cf. Jespersen 1924:352). In the more recent literature, the term was made popular by Baker (1970) and Labov (1972).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carl Leroy Baker|Baker, Carl Leroy]]. 1970. &amp;quot;Double negatives.&amp;quot; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Linguistic Inquiry&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1:169–186.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Martin Haspelmath|Haspelmath, Martin]]. 2005. &amp;quot;Negative Indefinite Pronouns and Predicate Negation.&amp;quot; In: Martin Haspelmath &amp;amp; Matthew S. Dryer &amp;amp; David Gil &amp;amp; Bernard Comrie (eds.) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The World Atlas of Language Structures.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 466-469.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto Jespersen|Jespersen, Otto]]. 1922. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; London: Allen &amp;amp; Unwin.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Labov|Labov, William]]. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Language&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 48:773–818.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{dc}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Syntax]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Morphology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Linguipedia</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>