http://glottopedia.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Split-Morphology_Hypothesis 2026-05-02T12:36:14Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.34.2 http://glottopedia.org/index.php?title=Split-Morphology_Hypothesis&diff=9605&oldid=prev 2009-06-09T13:27:40Z

<p>from utrecht</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>'''Split-Morphology Hypothesis''' is a hypothesis which entails that [[derivation]] and [[inflection]] are distinct, and belong to separate components of the grammar. Derivation is handled by lexical rules, while (regular) inflection is handled by syntactic rules. The Split-Morphology Hypothesis has been endorsed by Anderson (1977,1982,1988) Scalise (1984,1988), and Perlmutter (1988).<br /> <br /> === Links ===<br /> <br /> [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Split-Morphology+Hypothesis&amp;lemmacode=250 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]<br /> <br /> === References ===<br /> <br /> * Anderson 1977. ''On the formal description of inflection,'' CLS 13, 15-44, .<br /> * Anderson, S.R. 1988. ''Morphological Theory,'' in: Newmeyer, F.J. (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge survey I. Linguistic Theory: Foundations, pp. 146-191, Cambridge, CUP.<br /> * Anderson, S.R. 1982. ''Where's Morphology?,'' Linguistic Inquiry 13, pp. 571-612, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.<br /> * Perlmutter, D. 1988. ''The Split-morphology Hypothesis: evidence from Yiddish,'' in: Hammond, M. and M. Noonan (eds.) Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Orlando, Academic Press.<br /> * Scalise, S. 1988. ''Inflection and derivation,'' Linguistics 26, 561-582<br /> * Scalise, S. 1984. ''Generative Morphology,'' Foris, Dordrecht.<br /> <br /> {{dc}}<br /> [[Category:Morphology]]</div>

Wohlgemuth