T-model - Revision history

NBlöcher: Removed the block {{format}}

2014-08-17T07:06:43Z

Removed the block {{format}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 17 August 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:
	[[Category:General]]		[[Category:General]]

	{{stub}}{{cats~~}}{{format~~}}		{{stub}}{{cats}}

NBlöcher: Edited the format

2014-08-17T07:00:10Z

Edited the format

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 17 August 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Definition==
	The '''T-Model''' is a model of grammar prevalent in the [[Principles and Parameters framework]], which has the general structure in (i):		The '''T-Model''' is a model of grammar prevalent in the [[Principles and Parameters framework]], which has the general structure in (i):

Line 9:		Line 10:
	It is usually assumed that, in [[English]], DS ( [[D-structure]]) is generated by [[rewrite rule]]s, or is projected from the rules of [[X-bar theory]], and obeys the conditions of [[theta-theory]] and the [[Extended Projection Principle]]. SS ( [[S-structure]]) is derived from DS by the repeated application of [[affect alpha]] (e.g. [[NP-movement]] and [[Wh-movement]] ), and must meet the demands of [[Case]] theory, and possibly [[Binding Theory]]. LF ( [[Logical Form]]) is derived from SS through the application of affect alpha (e.g [[QR]], Wh-raising (see [[Wh-in-situ]])), and is regarded as the interface with the conceptual system; possibly, LF obeys Binding Theory and is the locus of gamma-checking ( [[gamma-marking]]). [[PF]] is derived from SS and is considered the interface with the articulatory-perceptual system. Both PF and LF are subject to the principle of [[Full interpretation]]. The division of labor among the three syntactic levels of representation (DS, SS, LF) is subject to debate, and may vary across languages.		It is usually assumed that, in [[English]], DS ( [[D-structure]]) is generated by [[rewrite rule]]s, or is projected from the rules of [[X-bar theory]], and obeys the conditions of [[theta-theory]] and the [[Extended Projection Principle]]. SS ( [[S-structure]]) is derived from DS by the repeated application of [[affect alpha]] (e.g. [[NP-movement]] and [[Wh-movement]] ), and must meet the demands of [[Case]] theory, and possibly [[Binding Theory]]. LF ( [[Logical Form]]) is derived from SS through the application of affect alpha (e.g [[QR]], Wh-raising (see [[Wh-in-situ]])), and is regarded as the interface with the conceptual system; possibly, LF obeys Binding Theory and is the locus of gamma-checking ( [[gamma-marking]]). [[PF]] is derived from SS and is considered the interface with the articulatory-perceptual system. Both PF and LF are subject to the principle of [[Full interpretation]]. The division of labor among the three syntactic levels of representation (DS, SS, LF) is subject to debate, and may vary across languages.

	=== Links ===		== Links ==
			*[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=T-model&lemmacode=173 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
	[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=T-model&lemmacode=173 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]

	~~=== References ===~~

			== References ==
	* Chomsky, N. 1993. ''A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,'' MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 1-67. Reprinted in: Chomsky (1995).		* Chomsky, N. 1993. ''A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,'' MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 1-67. Reprinted in: Chomsky (1995).
	* Chomsky, N. 1986a. ''Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use,'' Praeger, New York.		* Chomsky, N. 1986a. ''Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use,'' Praeger, New York.

Wohlgemuth: utrecht

2009-06-10T09:44:22Z

utrecht

New page

The '''T-Model''' is a model of grammar prevalent in the [[Principles and Parameters framework]], which has the general structure in (i):

(i) DS
|
SS
/ \
PF LF

It is usually assumed that, in [[English]], DS ( [[D-structure]]) is generated by [[rewrite rule]]s, or is projected from the rules of [[X-bar theory]], and obeys the conditions of [[theta-theory]] and the [[Extended Projection Principle]]. SS ( [[S-structure]]) is derived from DS by the repeated application of [[affect alpha]] (e.g. [[NP-movement]] and [[Wh-movement]] ), and must meet the demands of [[Case]] theory, and possibly [[Binding Theory]]. LF ( [[Logical Form]]) is derived from SS through the application of affect alpha (e.g [[QR]], Wh-raising (see [[Wh-in-situ]])), and is regarded as the interface with the conceptual system; possibly, LF obeys Binding Theory and is the locus of gamma-checking ( [[gamma-marking]]). [[PF]] is derived from SS and is considered the interface with the articulatory-perceptual system. Both PF and LF are subject to the principle of [[Full interpretation]]. The division of labor among the three syntactic levels of representation (DS, SS, LF) is subject to debate, and may vary across languages.

=== Links ===

[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=T-model&lemmacode=173 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]

=== References ===

* Chomsky, N. 1993. ''A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,'' MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 1-67. Reprinted in: Chomsky (1995).
* Chomsky, N. 1986a. ''Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use,'' Praeger, New York.
* Chomsky, N. 1981. ''Lectures on Government and Binding,'' Foris, Dordrecht.
* Haegeman, L. 1991. ''Introduction to Government and Binding Theory,'' Oxford, Blackwell.
* Riemsdijk, H. van & E. Williams 1981. ''NP-structure,'' The Linguistic Review 1-2, 171-218
* Riemsdijk, H. van and E. Williams 1986. ''Introduction to the theory of grammar,'' MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
* Williams, E. 1986. ''A Reassignment of the Functions of LF,'' Linguistic Inquiry 17-2, 265-299

{{dc}}
[[Category:General]]

{{stub}}{{cats}}{{format}}