Feature cooccurrence restrictions: Difference between revisions

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Szigetva (talk | contribs)
m →Example: pluralized section title
NBlöcher (talk | contribs)
Marked as {{ref}}
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]] (GPSG) uses '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) to formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures. As GPSG takes feature structures to be arbitrary sets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.
[[Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar]] (GPSG) uses '''Feature cooccurrence restrictions''' (FCRs) to formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures. As GPSG takes feature structures to be arbitrary sets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.


Many theories of phonological features also apply FCRs.
Many theories of phonological features also apply FCRs: pairs of features, or pairs of features together with their values, that cannot cooccur within a segment.


===Examples===
===Examples===
Line 15: Line 15:
===Other Languages===
===Other Languages===
* German [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions (de)]]
* German [[Feature cooccurrence restrictions (de)]]
{{dc}}
{{dc}}{{ref}}
[[Category:Syntax]]
[[Category:Syntax]]

Latest revision as of 16:17, 29 June 2014

Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG) uses Feature cooccurrence restrictions (FCRs) to formulate well-formedness conditions for feature structures. As GPSG takes feature structures to be arbitrary sets of feature specifications, it is necessary to block the combination of feature specifications which from a linguistic point of view make no sense. Most FCRs are formulated as implications.

Many theories of phonological features also apply FCRs: pairs of features, or pairs of features together with their values, that cannot cooccur within a segment.

Examples

Only verbal catgories can contain the feature vform: [VFORM] <math>\rightarrow</math> [+V, -N]

Phrasal catgories cannot contain the feature subcat: [BAR 2] <math>\rightarrow</math> <math>\neg</math> [SUBCAT]

The vocalic fatures [+high] and [+low] cannot cooccur: [+high] <math>\rightarrow</math> [-low] && [+low] <math>\rightarrow</math> [-high]

Comments

Modern unification-based grammar formalisms like Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar use typed feature structures instead.

Other Languages

REF This article has no reference(s) or source(s).
Please remove this block only when the problem is solved.