Difference between revisions of "Theta Criterion"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Edited the format and removed the block {{format}})
(Added the "see also" section)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
In Brody (1993) it is argued that the theta-criterion can be dispensed with.
 
In Brody (1993) it is argued that the theta-criterion can be dispensed with.
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[Theta identification]]
 +
*[[Theta-absorption]]
 +
*[[Theta-government]]
 +
*[[Theta-grid]]
 +
*[[Theta-position]]
 +
*[[Theta-role]]
 +
*[[Theta-role assignment]]
 +
*[[Theta-theory]]
  
 
== Links ==
 
== Links ==

Latest revision as of 09:34, 17 August 2014

Definition

Theta Criterion is a condition which states that at D-structure each argument is in a theta-position, and that each theta-position contains an argument. If the theta-criterion is defined over LF it says that each theta-position is in a unique chain, and that each chain contains a unique theta-position.

Examples

The theta-criterion accounts for the contrasts in (i) and (ii).

(i)   a   it seems that John is ill
      b  *Bill seems that John is ill
(ii)  a	  Bill believes that John is ill
      b	 *it believes that John is ill

In (i)b the argument Bill is in a theta-bar position; in (ii)b the expletive it (a non-argument) is in a theta-position. Originally, the theta-criterion stipulated a unique relationship between arguments and theta-roles (rather than theta-positions), forcing the analysis in (iii)b on John left angry: unless angry brings its own (PRO) argument, there would be two theta-roles (assigned by left and angry, respectively) for one argument (John). Revising the theta-criterion in terms of theta-positions allows the analysis in (iii)a where the unique argument John is in a unique theta-position associated with two theta-roles.

(iii) a	 John left angry
      b	 John left [PRO angry]

In Brody (1993) it is argued that the theta-criterion can be dispensed with.

See also

Links

References

  • Brody, M. 1993. Theta-theory and arguments, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 1-23
  • Chomsky, N. 1986a. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use, Praeger, New York.
  • Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.


STUB
CAT This article needs proper categorization. You can help Glottopedia by categorizing it
Please do not remove this block until the problem is fixed.