Hyperanalysis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Haspelmath (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Hyperanalysis is one of the four mechanisms of [[form-function reanalysis]] established by Croft (2000). He also refers to this mechanism as "overanalysis". The opposite process is at work in the mechanism of [[hypoanalysis]]. | Hyperanalysis is one of the four mechanisms of [[form-function reanalysis]] established by Croft (2000). He also refers to this mechanism as "overanalysis". The opposite process is at work in the mechanism of [[hypoanalysis]]. | ||
==References== | ===References=== | ||
*[[Croft, William]]. 2000. ''Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Perspective,'' ch. 5. Form-function reanalysis. Harlow: Longman, 117-144. | *[[Croft, William]]. 2000. ''Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Perspective,'' ch. 5. Form-function reanalysis. Harlow: Longman, 117-144. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:05, 29 October 2007
Through hyperanalysis, a linguistic unit loses a part or all of its meaning or function. This process takes place in a situation where the hearers interpret some inherent semantic or functional property of a linguistic unit as given by the context the item occurs in.
Hyperanalysis is one of the four mechanisms of form-function reanalysis established by Croft (2000). He also refers to this mechanism as "overanalysis". The opposite process is at work in the mechanism of hypoanalysis.
References
- Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Perspective, ch. 5. Form-function reanalysis. Harlow: Longman, 117-144.