Difference between revisions of "Clitic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Other languages: +CZ) |
(+ref) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In morphosyntax, a '''clitic''' is a [[bound]] element that is not as fully attached (to its [[host]]) as an [[affix]] is (to its [[base]]). The result of the combination of a clitic with its host is called [[clitic group]]. | In morphosyntax, a '''clitic''' is a [[bound]] element that is not as fully attached (to its [[host]]) as an [[affix]] is (to its [[base]]). The result of the combination of a clitic with its host is called [[clitic group]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Examples=== | ||
| + | In French, object pronouns are clitics which are either proclitics, as ''me'' and ''les'' in (i), or enclitics, as ''les'' in (ii): | ||
| + | |||
| + | :{| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |(i)||''il''||''me''||''les''||''a''||''donnés''|| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | ||he||to-me||them||has||given|| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | |colspan="2"|'he has given them to me'|| | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | :{| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |(ii)||''donnez''||''-les''||''-moi''|| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | ||give||-them||-me|| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | || | ||
| + | |colspan="2"|'give them to me'|| | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | :{| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |(iii)||''il''||''me<sub>i</sub>''||''les<sub>j</sub>''||''a ''||''donnés''||''e<sub>i</sub> ''||''e<sub>j</sub>''|| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | In syntax it is usually assumed that a clitic is related to a [[gap]], an [[empty category]] ([[trace]] or [[pro]]). But see [[clitic doubling]]. Example (i) is analyzed as in (iii), where e is a [[gap]]. | ||
===Subtypes=== | ===Subtypes=== | ||
*[[proclitic]] (a clitic that precedes its host) | *[[proclitic]] (a clitic that precedes its host) | ||
*[[enclitic]] (a clitic that follows its host) | *[[enclitic]] (a clitic that follows its host) | ||
| − | *[[endoclitic]], [[mesoclitic]] (a clitic that comes in the middle of its host) | + | *[[endoclitic]], [[mesoclitic]] (a clitic that comes in the middle of its host) |
| + | |||
| + | ===Comments=== | ||
| + | A clitic can thus be regarded as a kind of [[bound morpheme]]. A typical clitic will attach itself to a host, that is, a (fully inflected) [[word]] or [[phrase]]. The observation that they can attach to inflected words distinguishes, among other things, clitics from affixes. | ||
===Origin=== | ===Origin=== | ||
Since Classical Greek and Latin only had enclitics, the term [[enclitic]] is older than the general term ''clitic''. This general term was coined by [[back-formation]] only in the 20th century. | Since Classical Greek and Latin only had enclitics, the term [[enclitic]] is older than the general term ''clitic''. This general term was coined by [[back-formation]] only in the 20th century. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Link=== | ||
| + | [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Clitic&lemmacode=873 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics] | ||
===Other languages=== | ===Other languages=== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 50: | ||
*German [[Klitikon]] | *German [[Klitikon]] | ||
*Czech [[příklonka]] | *Czech [[příklonka]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===References=== | ||
| + | *Haegeman, L. 1991. ''Introduction to Government and Binding Theory.'' Oxford: Blackwell. | ||
| + | *Kayne, R. 1975. ''French Syntax.'' Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. | ||
| + | *Kayne, R. 1990. ''Romance clitics and PRO, Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting of NELS, CLSA.'' Univ. of Massachusetts: Amherst. | ||
| + | *Klavans, J. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175. | ||
| + | *Klavans, J. 1985. Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), ''The Structure of Phonological Representations (I),'' 131-175. | ||
| + | *Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. 1986. ''Prosodic Phonology.'' Dordrecht: Foris. | ||
| + | *Rizzi, L. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. ''Linguistic Inquiry 17,'' 501-557. | ||
| + | *Spencer, A. 1991. ''Morphological Theory.'' Oxford: Blackwell. | ||
| + | *Zwicky, A. 1977. Discourse and Logical Form. ''Linguistic Inquiry 8-1,'' 101-139. | ||
| + | *Zwicky, A. & Pullum, G. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't. ''Language 59,'' 509-513. | ||
{{dc}} | {{dc}} | ||
[[Category:Morphology]] | [[Category:Morphology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:04, 28 April 2008
In morphosyntax, a clitic is a bound element that is not as fully attached (to its host) as an affix is (to its base). The result of the combination of a clitic with its host is called clitic group.
Examples
In French, object pronouns are clitics which are either proclitics, as me and les in (i), or enclitics, as les in (ii):
(i) il me les a donnés he to-me them has given 'he has given them to me'
(ii) donnez -les -moi give -them -me 'give them to me'
(iii) il mei lesj a donnés ei ej
In syntax it is usually assumed that a clitic is related to a gap, an empty category (trace or pro). But see clitic doubling. Example (i) is analyzed as in (iii), where e is a gap.
Subtypes
- proclitic (a clitic that precedes its host)
- enclitic (a clitic that follows its host)
- endoclitic, mesoclitic (a clitic that comes in the middle of its host)
Comments
A clitic can thus be regarded as a kind of bound morpheme. A typical clitic will attach itself to a host, that is, a (fully inflected) word or phrase. The observation that they can attach to inflected words distinguishes, among other things, clitics from affixes.
Origin
Since Classical Greek and Latin only had enclitics, the term enclitic is older than the general term clitic. This general term was coined by back-formation only in the 20th century.
Link
Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics
Other languages
References
- Haegeman, L. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Kayne, R. 1990. Romance clitics and PRO, Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting of NELS, CLSA. Univ. of Massachusetts: Amherst.
- Klavans, J. 1982. From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), 131-175.
- Klavans, J. 1985. Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations (I), 131-175.
- Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Rizzi, L. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501-557.
- Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Zwicky, A. 1977. Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 8-1, 101-139.
- Zwicky, A. & Pullum, G. 1983. Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n't. Language 59, 509-513.
