Search results

Create the page "Feature-changing rule" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Rule feature
  ...ritic feature which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.
  934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014

Page text matches

• Structure-changing rule
  '''Structure-changing rule''' is a rule which changes already specified information, and renders the output form di ...hich devoices obstruents in a particular environment, say word final, this rule will be structure-changing if it changes [-son, +voice] into [-son, -voice]
  961 bytes (130 words) - 08:11, 16 August 2014
• Rule feature
  ...ritic feature which triggers (or blocks) the application of a phonological rule. This feature is usually assumed to account for irregular word formation. ...''tooth'', have a rule feature [+U] which triggers the phonological umlaut rule.
  934 bytes (134 words) - 14:52, 5 October 2014
• Absorption
  At [[LF]]: rule that derives a kind of [[conjunction]] of referential indices: This rule accounts for cases of crossed binding at [[LF]] (see [[Bach-Peters paradox]
  960 bytes (142 words) - 12:55, 17 January 2008
• Feature specification defaults
  ...category which are not determined by any other module of the grammar ([[ID-rule]], lexicon entry, [[Feature instantiation principles]], etc.). ...instantiated in any lexical category; i.e. it has to be licenced by an ID-rule or an lexical entry.
  773 bytes (106 words) - 16:19, 29 June 2014
• Redundancy rule
  '''Redundancy rule''' is rule which fills in predictable or redundant information. [[Redundancy]] rules h ...ving the feature [voice] unspecified, and fill in [+voice] by a redundancy rule. The idea behind redundancy rules and [[underspecification]] is that redund
  1 KB (206 words) - 15:05, 20 February 2009
• Structure-building rule
  ...ule''' is a rule which does not change already specified information. This rule just fills in information which is unspecified. ...he course of a derivation [voice] can be filled in by a structure-building rule. A property of structure-building rules is that the input and output are no
  1 KB (146 words) - 13:55, 9 June 2009
• Underspecification
  ...n all other contexts. See [[Structure preservation]], [[structure-building rule]].
  1,006 bytes (134 words) - 21:45, 7 February 2021
• Separation hypothesis
  ...separated from their [[function]]. Beard distinguishes [[L-rule]]s and [[M-rule]]s, and assumes that L-rules are grammatical processes which change or add ...he chance of giving phonological content to the function supplied by the L-rule.
  2 KB (267 words) - 19:11, 28 October 2014
• Lexicalization
  ...uming that lexicalization eradicates internal boundaries, the phonological rule FINAL DEVOICING cannot apply in the lexicalized form.
  1 KB (168 words) - 20:53, 16 February 2009
• Atom Condition
  ...is Atom Condition, Williams is able to account for the fact the affixation rule which attaches ''-ion'' can (indirectly) refer to the root features.
  2 KB (284 words) - 14:47, 15 February 2008
• Stress subordination principle
  ...assignment of stress in the [[compound]] ''black-board''. The main stress rule applies in a cyclic fashion (see [[cyclic domain]]), reassigning [1stress];
  1 KB (156 words) - 08:12, 16 August 2014
• User:Alek.storm/Notes
  ...model onto idiolectal phonotactics (there is a constraint and a repairing rule), just like trying to pronounce a second language - it gets filtered throug
  3 KB (511 words) - 18:07, 17 March 2010
• User:Haspelmath/List
  [[Categorial Rule]] [[Category-neutral rule]]
  54 KB (5,252 words) - 12:35, 21 February 2009
• User:Javier Carro/Linguistic terminology
  [[Categorial Rule]] [[Category-neutral rule]]
  55 KB (5,369 words) - 15:30, 23 December 2008
• Jan Czekanowski
  ...ndstill which, by the way, has remained so to this day. Exceptions to this rule, e.g. J. Woronczak’s ideas which, for various reasons, did not reach prac
  7 KB (1,007 words) - 13:00, 28 November 2007
• User talk:HPUJ86
  ...anyway it is mostly for artistic reasons. There is no specific grammatical rule for an adjective being gradable or non-gradable. Gradability or non-gradabi
  14 KB (2,036 words) - 12:47, 19 January 2013