Search results

Create the page "Zero affix" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Affix
  ...t, grammatical), especially compared to [[root]]s. The element to which an affix attaches to is called the [[base]] or root. ...eoretically, one can define reduplication as affixation where the attached affix (be it in-, pre, circum- or post-) is so formally weak that it harmonises w
  2 KB (320 words) - 00:57, 13 January 2014
• Affix substitution
  ...onsequence of this operation, the two affixes in question cannot co-occur. Affix substitution is an alternative to [[truncation]]. ...e'') (cf. Aronoff, 1976). Others have tackled this problem by allowing for affix substitution: ''-ee'' takes the structural position of ''-ate'', or, by the
  1 KB (183 words) - 20:27, 24 January 2008
• Class I/II affix
  In phonology and morphology, '''class I/II affix''' is a classification of (English) affixes. ...rsa (''*hopefulity''). This generalization is usually referred to as the [[Affix Ordering Generalization]].
  1 KB (200 words) - 13:47, 23 April 2008
• Latinate affix
  '''Latinate affix''' is a term used for [[affix]]es which are derived historically from [[Latin]] (or [[Greek]]), and which [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Latinate+affix&lemmacode=586 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  680 bytes (91 words) - 20:06, 16 February 2009
• Phrasal affix
  '''Phrasal affix''' is a term introduced by Klavans (1982, 1985) to refer to [[Clitic]]s. [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Phrasal+affix&lemmacode=401 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  460 bytes (61 words) - 20:56, 19 February 2009
• Affix Ordering Generalization
  '''Affix Ordering Generalization''' is a generalization over class I and [[class II Some well-known exceptions to the Affix Ordering Generalization are discussed in Aronoff (1976).
  1 KB (195 words) - 20:20, 24 January 2008
• Stress neutral affix
  ...rm which refers to one of the most characteristic properties of [[Class II affix]]es: the property of not having any effect on the [[stress pattern]] of the ...veness''). Stress neutral affixes are distinguished from [[stress shifting affix]]es.
  809 bytes (117 words) - 16:54, 10 June 2009
• Stress shifting affix
  ...erm which refers to one of the most characteristic properties of [[Class I affix]]es: the property of having effect on the stress pattern of the base. ...f affixes. Stress shifting affixes are distinguished from [[stress neutral affix]]es.
  935 bytes (139 words) - 16:54, 10 June 2009
• Compound Affix Ordering Generalization
  ...ass I affix]]es cannot appear outside [[compound]]s, while some [[Class II affix]]es may appear both inside and outside [[compound]]s. In other words, only [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Compound+Affix+Ordering+Generalization&lemmacode=900 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  1 KB (145 words) - 14:54, 7 May 2008
• One-affix-one-rule hypothesis
  The '''One-affix-one-rule hypothesis''' is a hypothesis which says that a [[word formation r ...r which agent nouns and instrument nouns are formed are identical. The one-affix-one-rule hypothesis says that we have two rules here, but this claim does n
  1 KB (172 words) - 16:13, 8 July 2009

Page text matches

• Bound morpheme
  ...mit'', ''commit'', etc.) which is not an [[affix]] but a [[root]] (since [[affix]]es may attach to it, forming a word) also cannot occur freely in syntax an One can distinguish two types of bound morphemes: (a) [[affix]]es, and (b) [[root]]s.
  875 bytes (140 words) - 09:39, 24 March 2008
• Affix substitution
  ...onsequence of this operation, the two affixes in question cannot co-occur. Affix substitution is an alternative to [[truncation]]. ...e'') (cf. Aronoff, 1976). Others have tackled this problem by allowing for affix substitution: ''-ee'' takes the structural position of ''-ate'', or, by the
  1 KB (183 words) - 20:27, 24 January 2008
• Boundary
  ...in Chomsky & Halle (1968) to express a distinction between two types of [[affix]]es. ...mative-boundary [[affix]] (i.e. ''+ity''), and ''-ness'' a word-boundary [[affix]] (i.e. ''#ness'').
  966 bytes (132 words) - 10:08, 25 March 2008
• Stress neutral affix
  ...rm which refers to one of the most characteristic properties of [[Class II affix]]es: the property of not having any effect on the [[stress pattern]] of the ...veness''). Stress neutral affixes are distinguished from [[stress shifting affix]]es.
  809 bytes (117 words) - 16:54, 10 June 2009
• Back formation
  ...ds are decomposed into a root and a affix if the language has a productive affix with the same phonological form as a part of the word that underwent back f ...ure: ('''''abcdef''''')_stem; the language also has a productive affix with the form (''ef'').
  1 KB (179 words) - 15:55, 7 September 2008
• Compound Affix Ordering Generalization
  ...ass I affix]]es cannot appear outside [[compound]]s, while some [[Class II affix]]es may appear both inside and outside [[compound]]s. In other words, only [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Compound+Affix+Ordering+Generalization&lemmacode=900 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  1 KB (145 words) - 14:54, 7 May 2008
• Latinate affix
  '''Latinate affix''' is a term used for [[affix]]es which are derived historically from [[Latin]] (or [[Greek]]), and which [http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Latinate+affix&lemmacode=586 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  680 bytes (91 words) - 20:06, 16 February 2009
• No Vacuous Application Principle
  ...(NVAP)''' is a principle proposed in Marantz (1984) which states that an [[affix]] marked with a given [[feature value]] cannot attach to a [[stem]] bearing he assumes that the English passive affix -''en'' has the lexical entry (i):
  1 KB (186 words) - 19:49, 17 February 2009
• Bound form
  ...st with [[bound form]]s. The term is most often used as a cover term for [[affix]] and [[clitic]], when the distinction between them is at issue. *[[affix]]
  440 bytes (65 words) - 14:11, 27 June 2007
• Flexionsaffix
  *Hyperonym: [[Affix]] englisch [[inflectional affix]]
  409 bytes (51 words) - 16:28, 29 June 2014
• Function composition
  ...an affix, however, does not satisfy a theta-role of the affix; rather the affix and the stem form a composed [[argument structure]]. In order to be able to
  1 KB (192 words) - 22:47, 13 February 2009
• Level
  ...x]]es (= [[Class I affix]]es) and [[stress neutral affix]]es (= [[Class II affix]]es). To account for this, it is assumed that Class I affixation takes plac
  1 KB (231 words) - 20:19, 16 February 2009
• Null affixation
  ...1933), Kiparsky (1982)) account for [[conversion]] by assuming that a null affix is added to a [[base]].
  864 bytes (126 words) - 20:00, 17 February 2009
• Ergative pattern
  ...well as the object of transitive verbs, while another [[case marker]] or [[affix]] is used for the subject of transitive verbs. The former [[case marker]] i
  916 bytes (136 words) - 17:42, 16 January 2008
• Stress shifting affix
  ...erm which refers to one of the most characteristic properties of [[Class I affix]]es: the property of having effect on the stress pattern of the base. ...f affixes. Stress shifting affixes are distinguished from [[stress neutral affix]]es.
  935 bytes (139 words) - 16:54, 10 June 2009
• Lexical transformation
  ...moves the inserted word into the lexically unspecified slot created by the Affix Rule (cf. iv): (i) drive [..]_NP<nowiki> =&gt; (= Affix Rule)
  2 KB (250 words) - 20:52, 16 February 2009
• Unitary Base Hypothesis
  ...tive verbs' or to the class of 'abstract nouns', but rules which attach an affix to both the class of 'transite verbs' and the class of 'abstract nouns' are
  680 bytes (102 words) - 16:42, 24 August 2014
• One-affix-one-rule hypothesis
  The '''One-affix-one-rule hypothesis''' is a hypothesis which says that a [[word formation r ...r which agent nouns and instrument nouns are formed are identical. The one-affix-one-rule hypothesis says that we have two rules here, but this claim does n
  1 KB (172 words) - 16:13, 8 July 2009
• Affix Ordering Generalization
  '''Affix Ordering Generalization''' is a generalization over class I and [[class II Some well-known exceptions to the Affix Ordering Generalization are discussed in Aronoff (1976).
  1 KB (195 words) - 20:20, 24 January 2008
• Template morphology
  ...consists of several obligatory and optional affixes, where each obligatory affix has its own position in the string and optional affixes are slotted into th
  906 bytes (127 words) - 07:17, 17 August 2014

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)