Difference between revisions of "Implication"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (utrecht)
 
(Added the "see also" section)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
This implication is true for every combination of [[truth value]]s for p and q. A logical consequence of [[predicate logic]] is the consequence of ThereIs(x) [ P(x) ] from P(c).
 
This implication is true for every combination of [[truth value]]s for p and q. A logical consequence of [[predicate logic]] is the consequence of ThereIs(x) [ P(x) ] from P(c).
 +
 +
===See also===
 +
*[[Antecedent]]
 +
*[[Denotation]]
 +
*[[Exemplification]]
 +
*[[Reference]]
  
 
=== Link ===
 
=== Link ===

Revision as of 08:47, 6 June 2014

FORMAT


Implication is a 1. (material implication) the combination in propositional logic of two formulae with the connective -> (if ... then ...), also called conditional. The implication of phi and psi, phi -> psi, is only false if phi (which is called the antecedent) is true while psi (the consequent) is false:

(i)	phi		psi	phi -> psi
	 1		 1	    1
         1		 0	    0
	 0		 1 	    1
	 0		 0	    1

2. (logical implication) the relation that exists between two sentences phi and psi if phi -> psi is a tautology. In other words, psi is the logical implication or logical consequence of phi if psi is true in every model in which phi is true.

Example

that q is a logical implication of (p V q) can be demonstrated by merely setting up the truth table for the formula in (ii):

(ii) (p V q) -> q

This implication is true for every combination of truth values for p and q. A logical consequence of predicate logic is the consequence of ThereIs(x) [ P(x) ] from P(c).

See also

Link

Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics

References

  • Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. Logic, language, and meaning, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.