Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...(ed.) 1982), the term '''grammatical function''' is used for [[grammatical relation]]s. ...rammatical relation'' is that the former refers to one of the members of a relation, while the latter refers to a link between two elements.
    1 KB (133 words) - 15:45, 15 February 2009
  • The term '''thematic relation''' is used (especially in Ray Jackendoff’s work and work influenced by hi Alongside [[thematic role]], [[Θ-role]], ''thematic relation'' is perhaps the most common term in current American linguistics (e.g. Wil
    1 KB (143 words) - 19:43, 26 June 2007
  • ...rammar]] had begun to take. It mainly focuses on [[syntax]], including its relation with morphology and semantics. The spelling ''Lexical-Functional Grammar'' is also used (e.g. Falk 2001, and on Joan Bresnan's ho
    4 KB (631 words) - 16:43, 9 April 2008
  • ...related word (e.g. ''dog'') than when there is no semantic or associative relation between the two words (e.g. ''map'').
    707 bytes (108 words) - 15:44, 22 May 2008
  • '''Determiner''' is term for any kind of (mostly) non-lexical element preceding a [[noun]] in a [[noun phrase]]. a relation between two sets taken as the denotation of a determiner in the theory of [
    2 KB (279 words) - 20:29, 12 February 2009
  • ...nto the cup''. Referential opacity is closely related to the property of [[lexical integrity]].
    842 bytes (134 words) - 09:14, 28 September 2014
  • '''Government''' is a structural relation between a [[governor]] (a head or maximal projection) and a [[governee]]. G The core case of government is the relation between a head and its complement; this case is captured by every existing
    2 KB (275 words) - 15:42, 15 February 2009
  • '''Object''' is a complement which is selected and directly governed by a lexical head. [[Category:Grammatical relation]]
    688 bytes (94 words) - 10:20, 18 February 2009
  • The term '''thematic role''' is a synonym of [[semantic role]] or [[thematic relation]], popularized by Chomsky (1981), although mostly in its abbreviated form [ *[[thematic relation]]
    1 KB (199 words) - 10:08, 10 June 2009
  • * In lexical semantics, complementarity is a [[sense relation]] that holds between predicates whose denotations do not overlap, i.e. ther
    595 bytes (92 words) - 18:55, 22 June 2014
  • A Wiki format is typical of the organisation of [[lexical knowledge]] on a morphological basis (alpha sort) supported by hypertext li ...ation of knowledge. As such, it is regarded more valueable and useful than lexical knowledge which is usually acquired through rote and incidental learning as
    3 KB (503 words) - 08:53, 23 November 2008
  • ...xical meaning]] vs. [[structural meaning]] (also [[grammatical meaning]]): Lexical meaning concerns the major parts-of-speech, i.e. [[noun|nouns]], [[verb|ver ...al meaning'): In this dichotomy 'lexical' is understood as one aspect of [[lexical meaning]] as described above, i.e. as a meaning that is [[langue]]-specific
    3 KB (375 words) - 13:18, 13 July 2014
  • ...and the other as its [[modifier]], attributing a property to the head. The relation between the members of an endocentric compound can be schematized as 'AB is * Kiparsky, P. 1982. ''From Cyclic Phonology to Lexical Phonology,'' in: Hulst, H. van der and N. Smith (eds.) The Structure of Pho
    1 KB (206 words) - 16:52, 13 February 2009
  • ...ctions' of human language: the existence of LF-uninterpretable features in lexical items, and [[movement]]. Movement of an element A with feature F to the [[c Chomsky (1998, 1999) takes a different view on the relation between feature checking and movement; there, movement is supposed to exist
    1 KB (217 words) - 13:31, 23 April 2008
  • Cohesion in its broadest sense is “a semantic relation between an element in [a] text and some other element that is crucial to th ...ed into the categories: reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction and lexical cohesion. “Each of these categories is represented in the text by particu
    22 KB (3,425 words) - 17:49, 26 June 2010
  • * Selkirk, E.O. 1984. ''Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure,'' Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. ...,'' in: M. Moortgat, H. Van der Hulst & T. Hoestra (eds.) The Scope of Lexical Rules, Foris, Dordrecht.
    3 KB (370 words) - 22:21, 13 February 2009
  • * Roeper, T. 1987. ''Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267-310 * Roeper, T. and D. Siegel 1978. ''A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds,'' Linguistic Inquiry 9, pp. 199-260
    1 KB (202 words) - 08:43, 16 August 2014
  • ...ts must be contextually given and the remnants must occur in a contrastive relation to their correlates (Winkler 1997 as mentioned in Winkler 2005, Johnson 199
    2 KB (359 words) - 16:55, 17 March 2009
  • [[Binding]] -- [[Cataphoric relation]] -- [[Connotation]] -- [[Cumulative reference]] -- [[Denotation]] -- [[Ext '''Lexical semantics'''<br>
    8 KB (928 words) - 09:11, 20 May 2010
  • * Roeper, T. 1987. ''Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation,'' Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267-310 * Roeper, T. and D. Siegel 1978. ''A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds,'' Linguistic Inquiry 9, pp. 199-260
    2 KB (232 words) - 19:05, 28 September 2014

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)