Difference between revisions of "Word"

From Glottopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+utrecht stuff)
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
===In syntax ===
 
===In syntax ===
 
 
Words are generally considered atomic elements: they are the indivisible building blocks of syntax, which may be the input but not the output of syntactic processes, their parts presumably being inaccessible for syntactic rules. See [[lexical integrity]].
 
Words are generally considered atomic elements: they are the indivisible building blocks of syntax, which may be the input but not the output of syntactic processes, their parts presumably being inaccessible for syntactic rules. See [[lexical integrity]].
 
  
 
===In phonology ===
 
===In phonology ===
 
 
Words are phonological objects which consitute the domain for lexical phonological rules. It is particularly striking that these three uses of the notion 'word' are not co-extensive.
 
Words are phonological objects which consitute the domain for lexical phonological rules. It is particularly striking that these three uses of the notion 'word' are not co-extensive.
  
 
=== Example ===
 
=== Example ===
 
+
A group consisting of a free morpheme and a clitic may function as a phonological word, although morphologically it is a clitic group consisting of a morphological word and a clitic.  
a group consisting of a free morpheme and a clitic may function as a phonological word, although morphologically it is a clitic group consisting of a morphological word and a clitic.  
 
 
 
  
 
===Other languages===
 
===Other languages===
French [[mot]] German [[Wort]]
+
*French [[mot]]  
 +
*German [[Wort]]
  
 
=== Links ===
 
=== Links ===
 
 
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Word&lemmacode=93 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
 
[http://www2.let.uu.nl/UiL-OTS/Lexicon/zoek.pl?lemma=Word&lemmacode=93 Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics]
  
 
=== References ===
 
=== References ===
 
 
* Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Aronoff, M. 1976. ''Word Formation in Generative Grammar,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. ''On the Definition of Word,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
 
* Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. ''On the Definition of Word,'' MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
Line 43: Line 37:
 
[[Category:Word|!]]
 
[[Category:Word|!]]
 
[[Category:Morphology]]
 
[[Category:Morphology]]
 +
 +
{{stub}}

Revision as of 19:55, 2 August 2014

A word is most simply defined as an element that is listed in the dictionary (= lexeme) or that occurs between two spaces in the spelling or the linguist's description (= word-form).

Words are morphological objects which may but need not be the output of processes of affixation and compounding.

These definitions are of course not satisfactory, because they do not say why linguists enter elements into a dictionary or write them between two spaces etc.

Subtypes

In syntax

Words are generally considered atomic elements: they are the indivisible building blocks of syntax, which may be the input but not the output of syntactic processes, their parts presumably being inaccessible for syntactic rules. See lexical integrity.

In phonology

Words are phonological objects which consitute the domain for lexical phonological rules. It is particularly striking that these three uses of the notion 'word' are not co-extensive.

Example

A group consisting of a free morpheme and a clitic may function as a phonological word, although morphologically it is a clitic group consisting of a morphological word and a clitic.

Other languages

Links

Utrecht Lexicon of Linguistics

References

  • Aronoff, M. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Di Sciullo, A. M. and E. Williams 1987. On the Definition of Word, MIT-press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Sapir, E. 1921. Language, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
  • Selkirk, E. O. 1982a. The Syntax of Words, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
STUB